广州百花园犬马之家

您现在的位置 > 广州百花园犬马之家 > 名花录悦来香 > 内容详情:

Decision-making system is the most important

Further, there are various systems in the system, such as political system, economic system, fiscal system, financial system, and so on. So, which system is the most important among the various systems? I think that the decision-making mechanism is the top priority.
 

Still taking World War II as an example, an important reason why Americans can make atomic bombs before the Germans is its decision-making mechanism, so that the correct opinions of scientists can be passed to the US president in time, even though it costs Some twists and turns, but the president still adopted the advice of the scientists in time, and finally created an atomic bomb in front of the Axis, ending the war ahead of time.
 

After the reform and opening up, China's decision-making mechanism has also undergone great changes. Since the 1980s, the central leadership has proposed to make scientific and democratic decisions. As a result, the role of think tanks is becoming more and more important. In particular, the National Reform Commission and the Development Research Center of the State Council were established. These two “policy research institutions” with small scale, few people, no approval authority, and no departmental interests, a key research reform, a key study. Development, of course, sometimes has crossovers and competition.
 

In addition to these two policy research institutions directly affiliated with the State Council, each department has also established its own “Policy Research Office”, and each province and city has its own “Laboratory” or “Research Center”. Before the introduction of the policy, most of them need to be repeatedly researched and evaluated by these research institutions. Therefore, the scientific nature of decision-making has been greatly improved.
 

The really complicated and controversial part is how to evaluate the behavior of the toll booth staff throwing stones to hurt the girl. Because in addition to the civil liability for personal injury compensation, if the girl is slightly injured, the stoned person may be suspected of criminal liability for intentional injury.
 

One view is that the act of throwing stones is a legitimate defense. The Heilongjiang Expressway Management Regulations stipulate that forcible highway toll stations, highway management agencies, and highway operators can take measures to prevent them from leaving. Aside from the above provisions, if the forced Leica evasion is suspected of committing crimes, the toll station staff members are of course entitled to defend. But the problem is that legitimate defense can only target the perpetrators who are committing illegal infringements, with the aim of preventing illegal infringement. The stone throwing in this case does not prevent the vehicle from escaping, and it is not the Leica driver but the girl in the vehicle who is injured. Therefore, it is not appropriate to evaluate the stone throwing of a car with legitimate defense.